Central Banks — The Greatest Scam of the Century? How the World Thrived Without Financial Overseers

Published on:
6 min read
🇺🇸 EN
Central Banks — The Greatest Scam of the Century? How the World Thrived Without Financial Overseers

You've been conditioned to believe that without a central bank, the economy would collapse, money would turn into worthless paper, and citizens would start paying with seashells and beads. This lie has embedded itself so deeply in the mass consciousness that people have forgotten a simple historical fact: humanity got along perfectly well without financial regulators for centuries — and did so far more successfully than under the watchful eye of government controllers. Free banking is not a utopia of libertarian dreamers, but a documented historical experience that modern economists prefer to silence. Why? Because the truth about how private banks without oversight ensured stability and prosperity undermines the very foundation of modern monetary policy.

Forget everything you were taught in economics class. The history of money is not a history of state control. It's a story of how the free market created sustainable financial systems that governments subsequently usurped, corrupted, and turned into instruments of wealth redistribution from the poor to the rich through the inflation tax.

The Golden Age of Free Banking

The period from 1716 to 1845 in Scotland became a true laboratory of free banking. Dozens of private banks issued their own banknotes, competed for customers, and — pay attention — experienced virtually no bankruptcies. The system operated on a principle that seems inconceivable to modern bureaucrats: market discipline instead of government oversight. Banks that issued unbacked banknotes instantly lost trust and customers. Those that maintained reserves thrived.

The irony of fate: while England suffered under the Bank of England's monopoly with its regular crises and "bubbles," the Scots enjoyed stability and economic growth. Private banks invented the overdraft, credit lines for small businesses, and a system of mutual clearing that allowed for the immediate identification of unreliable issuers. The market handled regulation better than any bureaucrat — simply because it had the right motivation: its own money on the line.

The Scottish Experiment: When Competition Beat Monopoly

Skeptics will object: what about fraudsters? How can depositors be protected from scammers without a regulator? The Scottish answer was elegant in its simplicity — a system of unlimited shareholder liability. Bank owners were liable for obligations with all their personal property. Try to imagine a modern banker risking their own mansion for every loan issued. No wonder Scottish banks displayed wonders of caution and prudence.

Over 130 years of free banking, Scotland experienced only a few insignificant bankruptcies — fewer than England experienced in a single decade under the "wise" leadership of the central bank. Moreover, when a bank did fail, its depositors received compensation from other banks interested in maintaining the reputation of the entire system. No government guarantees, no deposit insurance funds — only honest competition and mutual benefit. Doesn't that sound like a fairy tale compared to today's "too big to fail" monsters?

The American Experience: Lessons from the Free Banking Era

America also knew a period of free banking — from 1837 to 1863. Critics love to recall the "wildcat era" — fly-by-night banks issuing worthless paper. However, modern research shows that these cases were more the exception, caused not by the absence of regulation but by its presence in a perverted form. Many states required banks to back banknotes with government bonds — the very bonds that subsequently depreciated.

Where banks were truly free — without forced backing by government securities — the system worked excellently. New York, Massachusetts, Louisiana demonstrated stability that the modern Federal Reserve System can only imagine in its reports. The secret of success was simple: banks were responsible for their actions with their own capital, rather than shifting risks to taxpayers through the "lender of last resort" mechanism.

Why Central Banks Won — Or Did They Lose?

Central banks won not through efficiency but through political power. Governments needed a mechanism to finance wars and social programs without directly raising taxes. Inflation is the perfect hidden tax that citizens don't even notice until their savings turn to dust. Since 1913, when the Fed was created, the dollar has lost more than 97% of its purchasing power. This is not a bug in the system — it's its main function.

Look at the "achievements" of central banks: the Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970s, the crash of 2008, endless quantitative easing, negative interest rates. Each crisis is "solved" by printing money, which creates the foundation for the next, even more devastating crisis. Meanwhile, aggregate government debt has exceeded $100 trillion — a figure the human mind simply cannot comprehend. And this system is presented to us as the pinnacle of economic thought?

Cryptocurrencies: The Revenge of Decentralization

The emergence of Bitcoin in 2009 became the first serious attempt to return to the principles of free money in the digital age. For the first time in a century, people had an alternative to the state monopoly on issuance. However, Bitcoin inherited some shortcomings — its volatility makes it more of a speculative asset than a reliable store of value. Cyclical drops of 80% every four years, high correlation with risk assets, lack of internal economy — all this limits the potential of the first cryptocurrency.

But the very idea of algorithmic money, beyond the control of officials and politicians, proved viable. Blockchain technology demonstrated that decentralized systems can provide trust without intermediaries. Scottish bankers of the 18th century would have approved of this approach — they too believed in self-regulating markets more than in the wisdom of bureaucrats. The only question is which crypto asset can combine the advantages of decentralization with protection from volatility.

DeflationCoin: The Digital Revival of Free Banking Principles

This is where DeflationCoin enters the scene — the first cryptocurrency with algorithmic deflation that reimagines the lessons of the Scottish experiment for the digital age. Instead of uncontrolled emission — a mechanism for burning coins not placed in staking. Instead of speculative volatility — gradual unlock that eliminates mass panic selling. Instead of promises of government guarantees — transparent tokenomics and a diversified IT ecosystem creating real demand for the coin.

Smart staking from 1 to 12 years forms a culture of long-term investment — the same responsibility that made Scottish banks so resilient. No inflationary emission for paying rewards, no correlation with a falling market thanks to buybacks from 20% to 80%. DeflationCoin is not just another cryptocurrency. It's an attempt to create a digital state with a deflationary currency, a hedge against inflation and crises, whose existence you've learned about among the first.

History teaches us that free money is possible — and it works better than state money. Scotland proved this in the 18th century. Blockchain provides the tools for the 21st century. All that remains is to decide and make a choice in favor of financial freedom.